photo by Corky Lee

Life or Liberty: Prosecution in Lawyer's Terror Trial Is Accused of Playing on Fear Home | Liberty News Farouk and Friends
Homeland Security
| Prosecution in Lawyer's Terror Trial Is Accused of Playing on Fear »

January 05, 2005

Prosecution in Lawyer's Terror Trial Is Accused of Playing on Fear

January 5, 2005

The New York Times

By JULIA PRESTON

A defense lawyer in the trial of Lynne F. Stewart, a lawyer charged with conspiring with Egyptian terrorists, accused the government yesterday of trying to play on jurors' fears by repeatedly referring to Osama bin Laden and the Sept. 11 attacks during the trial.

The sharp criticism of the prosecutors came on the first day of closing arguments by Kenneth A. Paul, a lawyer for one of Ms. Stewart's co-defendants, Ahmed Abdel Sattar. The prosecutors in the trial, in Federal District Court in Manhattan, have emphasized that Mr. Sattar had numerous telephone conversations with Egyptian Islamic militants who were in close contact with Mr. bin Laden. Mr. Sattar is a Staten Island postal worker who worked as a court-appointed paralegal aide with Ms. Stewart.

Mr. Paul said the prosecutors had "so blatantly attempted to tug and play upon those fears" of "the No. 1 enemy of the United States." He told the jurors that the government had tried "to scare you into thinking" that the case involved "a direct threat to the national security of the United States."

Judge John G. Koeltl has often reminded the jury during the six-month trial that Mr. bin Laden is not part of the case. But Mr. bin Laden still appeared repeatedly in the government's presentation, most notably in a videotape, recorded somewhere in Afghanistan and broadcast on television in the Middle East in September 2000, in which he threatened to attack the United States to win the release from prison of a client of Ms. Stewart's. The client, Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, is a blind Islamic cleric who is serving a life sentence in an American prison for a thwarted plot to bomb landmarks in New York.

Two Egyptian Islamic militants who, the evidence has shown, had frequent telephone conversations with Mr. Sattar appear on the video with Mr. bin Laden.

But the prosecutors never showed that Mr. Sattar had anything to do with making the videotape. The main evidence in the trial was drawn from about 85,000 secretly recorded intercepts of Mr. Sattar's home telephone made by the F.B.I. between 1995 and 2002. Mr. Sattar is facing a charge of conspiracy to kill and kidnap in a foreign country, which carries a maximum life sentence.

The government presented no evidence that Ms. Stewart knew in any detail about Mr. Sattar's calls with the Egyptian militants.

Mr. Paul said Mr. Sattar had followed guidance from Ms. Stewart and other lawyers for Mr. Abdel Rahman when he sent letters to the sheik in prison with messages from Egyptian Islamists. Mr. Sattar did not help to disseminate any message from the sheik that he understood to be a call for violence, Mr. Paul said.

Posted by aderkon on January 5, 2005 10:15 AM




CATEGORIES
Action Alerts
Director's Blog
Farouk and Friends
Homeland Security
Immigrants' Rights
Screenings and Events
RECENT ENTRIES
"OTHER, OTHER…" screening and panel at Hostos Art Gallery

Demand Immediate Release of Palestinian Nonviolent Resistance Activist

Rising Up: the Alams screening at NYC Grassroots Media Conference

VIDEO: Vigil for Immigrant Detainees at Bergen County Jail

PRESS CONFERENCE ANNOUNCING DEBBIE ALMONTASER'S LAWSUIT AGAINST THE DOE, THE CHANCELLOR, AND THE MAYOR

Immigration Dialogue in Brooklyn

VIDEO: New Yorkers Rally to Defend Arabic-Language School

Communities in Support of the Khalil Gibran International Academy

Rising Up: The Alams at MNN's Digital Garden Summer

OUT OF STATUS premiere at Pioneer Theater

ARCHIVES
June 2008
April 2008
March 2008
December 2007
November 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
August 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
February 2004

1998-2004
This website contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This material is made available to advance understanding of, inter alia, human rights, legal, political, foreign policy and social justice issues. The publisher of this website believes this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law and in other applicable legislation. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site may be distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Permission is granted to make use of any editorial material on this site provided that the source is acknowledged.